Promote mutual learning
to strengthen competences and advance knowledge.
- Respect and engage with different forms of knowledge.
- Promote peer learning and career development.
- Acknowledge the contributions of all partners.
Global research partnerships aim to bring together different perspectives and priorities. Participants therefore require a broad range of competences, including curiosity about and respect for different forms of knowledge. These diverse knowledge forms include knowledge from different disciplines, non-academic experts, practical action, and lived experiences. By fostering mutual learning, we can better understand, combine, and jointly advance these different forms of knowledge – while acknowledging and rewarding the contributions of different actors.
Competences and capacities for global research are not inherent: they need to be built and continuously strengthened. If research partnerships focus only on extracting knowledge, they miss the critical opportunity to develop the very competences and capacities needed for effective collaboration. Such competences and capacities include academic skills (e.g. collecting data, conducting lab work, writing articles); intercultural skills (e.g. learning to communicate in another language, cultural reflexivity and sensitivity); or translational skills (e.g. experience in science–policy interfaces). Importantly, these refer not only to individual skills but also to the capacities of institutions and entire research systems.
Research partnerships provide a unique environment for strengthening individual competences through mutual learning and career development. Partner institutions can foster support for peer learning, mentorship, and academic career advancement, for example through degrees, authorship, and formal positions within a project. In turn, these collaborations can strengthen the partner institutions by boosting specific academic or organizational capacities, as well as their local and global reputation. Furthermore, research partnerships can contribute to shaping entire research systems, for example by prioritizing specific academic journals or influencing the perception of academia in a specific country.


